Wednesday, 8 January 2025

Fundamental Obstacles to Africa’s Intellectual Renaissance

 Introduction

A closer look at Africa from inside and outside suggest among other movements a renewal of enduring tensions between forces at various scales since 2020. These tensions seem to have ebbed away or rather receded from the 1990s following the collapse of the Soviet Union. However post-collapse didn’t bring positive growth on most Africa’s indicators of life for the majority. Bad situations got worse before advancing to a freefall from 2011 to the present. The forces driving this collective holistic degeneration of peoples are consistent, unwavering and predictable. For many reasons, the intellectual springs and most African intellectuals either ignore the true underlying currents or fail to appreciate the reality of their structural power. Our focus in this output is to unveil two features of these gaps both of which reinforce each other.

Function of Time

Most readings of Africa’s experience even among Africans on the continent and in diaspora flow from unquestioned imposed timelines. Even when the timelines are appropriated, the substance of outcomes offer lightweight testimonies of positively disruptive solutions to facts of the ground. In most cases timelines are presented as mostly short and medium, both of which are insufficient and insignificant for comprehensive investigation of complexity. The popular timeline is the 1950s – 1960s given as disruptive when colonial powers or rather European elite offered most African nationalist leaders flag independence. If critical reflection is tolerated, such gestures of deceit were made without compensation after an average of 100 years of violent imposition. None of the colonial structures, philosophy, strategy and institutions including religions were radically changed. Just a change of personnel!

A wrong reading of pre-flag independence endured from colonial miseducation policies with its brainwashing operations and reductionist curricula. While indigenous neocolonial leaders pretend to offer credible alternatives, their policies only reinforced colonial agenda. Colonial oppression, massacres and genocide of millions of indigenous Africans were extended with radical passion in the name of national security. Many intellectuals move to uncritically glorify colonial excesses and even make pyrrhic distinctions between the British, Portuguese, Belgian and the French as if oppression and genocides as categories operated strictly along those lines.

Sadly, indigenous leaders including intellectuals since 1950s – 1960s settled for perpetuating false narratives of European superiority while failing repeatedly to show positive replications on the grounds. These deluded minds only feast on their illusions in so far as their lower appetites located in narrow personal interest are satisfied. They seek legitimacy without solidarity. There was nothing for the community and the peoples. The illusion is propagated in universities, secondary and primary schools in state-sanctioned intellectual poisoning of generations via public education. Till this day, cheerleaders with numerous degrees and rabid spokespersons in high places including religions continue to wax lyrical for indigenous mass degeneration. Colonialism in all its forms have no positive, it is an inherently evil geopolitical and geoeconomic strategy implemented by European elite with premeditated mass murder from institutional violence.

Civilisational Appeal

While colonialism in all its forms is evil regardless of timeline and executor, an extended timeline opens a wider frame for appraising it without diminishing the features of its operation in Africa. There are enduring core African principles recognised across diverse communities. These are family, community, religion and learning. This is the bedrock of millennia of civilisations and developments across the continents during periods of ascendance and instability respectively. Internal contexts offer useful insights on how peoples organise and developed. A longer time frame favour broader outlines of principles and features of mechanisms. Civilisations are never static and aren’t imposed to change radically in very short periods. Africa for the most part is an exporter of life and dispenser of true nobility.

The last 500 years has validated Europe as a geography of regression for Africans whose main products and exports to Africa till this day are evil and death. All European institutions and elite are united in their conviction that their boots of impunity and oppression on the neck of Africans is normative. This is a systematic geostrategic initiative with consistent resonance and sustaining power in each generation. Unfortunately most African intellectuals prefer to disinterestedly essentialise this clear stream of intergenerational construct against the strategic interest of their peoples. They offer no counter-narrative or contrary presentations. For those whose lands and peoples where subject to the gravest holocaust for over 300 years, in the form of international trade in African persons, intellectual dishonesty is intolerable. It is not so much that European elite spare their own peoples, no. The so-called first and second world wars with millions of fatalities are indisputable testimonies. European peoples worth less than their projected profits.

The idea that European elite offer shining examples for Africa’s advancement is reprehensive. To suggest that an uncritical implementation of so-called European theories and strategies for the strategic uplifting all Africans including the dead without taking into account indigenous cosmologies, civilisational realities and unique experiential categories is fraudulent. The avoidance of asymmetrical response and critical interrogation of foreign ideas, experiences, hypothesis and theories prior to implementation is the fountain of most African intellectuals. They are not only blind to inherent goodness of Africans, they accentuate their ignorance by explicating their own ontological poverty, thoughtlessness and historical unconsciousness.

Conclusion

The current global geopolitical conflagration is a strong sign of the times, a slow transition to an irreversible phase. Our reflection reaffirm the inherent evil of colonialism and delineate Europe as a space of evil and death (for Africans collectively), its enduring primary exports to Africa. Europe is not an example, its elite are strategically conditioned to go violently against Africa’s interest. Most African intellectuals have refused or failed to acknowledge consistent facts, patterns and relationships. The currency of new reactions and tentative counter-actions in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger are the first robust entrĂ©e to indigenous appropriation of history since the 1960s. While it is too early to draw conclusions, all the hallmarks of indigenous resistance to European elite and defacing of flag independence are undeniable in these territories.