Tent, Upheavals and National Security

Introduction

The last 2 years has accelerated with precision characteristic hubris of imperialistic machine in North Africa. It is important to stress that Africa is a single continental block including her continental shelves, islands and peoples. Acts of imperial preponderance with associated metageographical reconfigurations which attempt to partition or decapitate the continent are time-constrained for each imperial power. Therefore one should not be confused with the concept of ‘Middle East’ that includes contiguous parts of Africa. Be that as it were, the focus of the piece is to highlight what amounts to geopolitical 419 in the name of ‘revolutions’ executed with clinical efficiency as it simultaneously simulates national security loses in the national security crisis.

Flag of the Tent

Tents have many meanings but more so to nomadic and desert communities. Considering the harsh climatic conditions that necessitated their emergence, functionally they are complete in the face of the elements. The howling dry winds, harsh hot storms and deadly sandstorms abet for those staying tents. It is a bastion of security in its unique place and time. Of course majority of human population who have been relatively sedentary have cultivated superiority in their perceptions of tents as fit only for the less Other.

In the last few decades, tents warmed their way into international diplomacy in a curious way. For many observers it represented nothing short of irrationality at best and mediaeval at worst. Nevertheless those who pitch their tents in the face of severe geopolitical machinations though they later lost were prescient.  It is not lost on anyone that late Libyan president, Col Muammar Ghaddafi, raised the flag of illegal surveillance and gradual emergence of surveillance geopolitics but was dismissed.  On a number of occasions be it state visits or visit to United Nations in US, this leader preferred pitching his tent in an open space or rather created Libya in a temporary abrogation of imposed metageographical construction. Diplomats and Heads of State stay in posh hotels and special houses in the hosting countries.

With the emergence of Wikileaks and Mr Edward Snowden, it is clear that Col Ghaddafi was not only ahead of the times but his allergy confirmed the massive surveillance machine then dismissed as irrationality. It is now common knowledge that US regime’s surveillance apparatus has no regard for diplomatic norms and international conduction as United Nations diplomats and visiting Heads of States are fair game. Overt and covert operations are deployed to capture voice record, passwords and DNA of the gullible lot. So much for staying in real houses and hobnobbing with ‘friends and allies’! Only time will reveal how much intel have been creamed off Nigerian diplomats abroad and in the External Affairs Ministry Abuja by US surveillance machine!

Upheavals in the North

A few years ago rent-a-crowd of a different kinds started mutating in various North African countries.  Talk of democracy increased as economies of United States and European Union started heaving like emphysema patients. With populations in various shapes of political maturity drifting in and out awareness coma, they were bombarded with strong advertisement of ‘liberty and freedom’ and ‘revolution’. With unprecedented firepower where applicable colonial war for scarce resources were unleashed with genocidal aplomb in a ‘Yes, we can’ charisma from the ‘rear’; communities became entombed.

Rewind to the present Libya which is no longer a state, Egypt is haemorrhaging, Tunisia barely sleep-walking and ‘revolutions’ were affirmed without change of power from the ruling class to the ruled. Apparently the status quo barely changed for the better. This is classic geopolitical 419 101! Whoever sold the construct that massive crowds without coherent, independent and articulate political roadmap could grab power without force or violence from an entrenched group is the ultimate salesperson. Nice one! The Egyptian reversal waited and reached its natural conclusion. Now my dear North African ‘revolutionaries’, please go home and find something to eat and later seat down to plan for grabbing power by any means.

Snowden and Nigeria

Snowden is resting in Russia but his fart is smelling big time in various capitals. What is it for Nigeria? While spying Nigeria Embassies is a forgone conclusion, what of interference into domestic affairs? Are local telecommunication carriers and internet service providers compromised? Are submarine cables transmitting data to Nigeria compromised? What does the high service-charging MTN, Globacom, Etisalat and the lot incredibly do to their vast customers? At least Wikileaks established the pattern of intrusions and subversion of internal affairs/national interest by state and non-state actors. The establishment of US Drone Base in Niamey, Niger, is nothing reassuring to Abuja rather is a threat to Nigeria’s strategic interest in the West Africa.

Conclusion

In the single race of the single military superpower toward a surveillance state, nation states have become perfect tools for compromise and destruction in the insatiable hunger for information. Nigeria no doubt is too weak an entity and too confused a viable state to raise talk less of highlighting the issues of alleged illegal surveillance. Rather   Nigeria and many other states will be collaterally damaged in the US quest for total domination in military and cyber spheres. There is a consolation anyway, which is the fact that in this race for unchallenged domination lie seeds of self-degradation, overreach and apparent self-diminution which may restrict Washington DC to her front yard in time. In the meantime her erstwhile backyard is gradually reverting to its rightful owners.

One small step for United Kingdom, one giant leap for ….

Recent developments in Syria has gone in overdrive towards accelerating plans and complexity which above all are intended to finally quarantine Arabistan for years to come. While Cairo got a breathing space from intense media coverage of its coup-is-not-a-coup, the use of banned gases in Damascus that resulted in massive dead has among other things exposed many players definition of reason and due-process. From making doubtful conclusions to jumping without looking to making a mess of due-process, finally the usual dogs-of-war, merchants of death and hustlers of innocent blood have repositioned to cash their pay. United Kingdom is one of those playing her allocated part.

Interestingly those calling for punishment of Damascus without diplomacy, due-process and evidence are isolated and should be. The same capitals who flaunt their democratic and rule of raw credentials have once again failed miserably in standing up for their beliefs.  One would have expected London to initially call for full investigation of the alleged gas incident rather Mr David Cameron made a direct detour for immediate military attack. The hubris of Tripoli few years ago remain evergreen. Constrained success begets constrained success! Of course he’s a direct descendant of Blair-lite remora geopolitics. How times have changed!

Since democracy and rule of law have failed London, apparently London did not fail. It is clear that from Mr Cameron’s perspective, United Kingdom lack independence, sovereignty and integrity to stand alone from the shark of White House. By so doing Mr Cameron allowed himself into believing that British people are no more than willing lapdogs who are doomed to jump as high as directed. Misreading an ally’s intention, despising party line and ignoring public opinion are not marks of a politician of worthy stripe, rather are attributes of one lacking legitimacy and sees national pride as anathema. One cannot legitimately accuse Conservative Party of signing up for the questionable decision to attack Damascus for now.

Unfortunately Mr Cameron missed important issues. Times have changed and public opinion‘s memory bank is not depleted. His reading of Washington DC’s imperial power was misleading and inaccurate. The times of London unquestioned nodding to State Department’s instructions may be declining. United State power is diminishing and many indicators are already on display. United Kingdom possesses the chance to commence baby-steps towards post US hegemony. The West or what is left of it is increasingly isolated and blind followership of United States will not help matters. The rest of the world is watching these changes in fortune as a gradual as they evolve with keen interest.

In view of this Labour Party arrived well to the party even though the jury is still out on their brand of foreign policy and ‘special’ relationship with Washington DC. By accurately reading public opinion, weak global appetite for conflict and declining economic fortunes, Mr Ed Miliband defied conventional wisdom by leading his party on the argument of caution, common sense and respect for due-process in international law. In a sense he robustly taught the constitutional law professor holding the fort in Washington DC.  He equally distinguished himself from a previous party leader and former prime minister, marking a sharp contrast that UK politicians have deep appreciation for their country and its national interest rather than blind followership of questionable blood-thirsty military campaigns. He also repositioned his party as the party of reason when it comes to foreign policy, a party ready for post-US hegemony and finally a party for true UK independence and sovereignty. Of course it will take time to unravel if he’ll finally put finishing touches on these first showings. He has not made a strong show of his position on supply and funding sources of the current Syrian civil war. Too early for the end of Remora Geopolitics!

Nevertheless it is abundantly clear that Liberal Democrats have rightly dissolved their credibility as the anti-war party as they are now singing Coalition war hymns. They are the main loser in the current discourse.

It is worth noting that around the world United States and United Kingdom are isolated in their warmongering. Paris is a surprise late entrée. It beggars belief that Charles De Gaulle’s France is now jumping and barking loud for State Department since ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy, hence making London compete strongly to fend her off the special relationship prize. Apparently De Gaulle needs to be given a final burial as his France has ceased to exist. So much for Gallic pride! European Union ranking members seem to be humming along the anticipated script without declared commitment to rhetoric or imminent action.

Events are still unfolding nevertheless this is the first stab on the test of future relevance of UK politicians as the right custodians of UK independence and sovereignty. Labour Party has opened up a new vista towards potential reconfiguration of Remora geopolitics into a foreign policy fit for a future where US power is diminishing or diminished. Then UK will once again take her rightful place in the comity of nations.

Deportation Lagos State Footprint

Introduction

The media is abuzz with the latest display of political incoherence and strategic blunder of Lagos State in the guise of internally deporting Nigerian citizens across state boundary under false premise. For a state that converges as the commercial centre of the country and an international interface such a policy comes in conflict with expectations of social-conscious governance for both the state and its governor.  The article attempts to review the issues at stake including positions taken by select members of a motley crew of state officials and media sympathisers as well as point out rich reserves of historical amnesia on their parts.

Action Governor

This week many newspapers have been running with the story regarding internal deportation of 70 Nigerian citizen-residents of Lagos State to Anambra State on the orders of Governor Babatunde Fashola.  Further investigation confirmed that the policy is standard policy of the state as part of an overarching policy implementation instrument.  This is an interesting development in the life of both state and the republic as it carries a lot of uncertainties. Our position is to review the position taken by the state from a legal point of view.

Legal Hellhole

A number of pundits have resorted to becoming state echo-chamber without credible facts for or against the policy. Nevertheless before tackling the problem one must initially address the issue of citizenship in Nigeria with regard to states and local governments. While the first line of citizenship is without question except when ex-president, Alhaji Shehu Shagari, deported Alhaji Shugaba to the Sahel, internal deportation has always carried the spot-mark of illegality mostly under the threat of death under irrepressible religio-politcally motivated violence.

It my understanding that 2^nd line and 3^rd line citizenship based on domicile is unclear in Nigeria. It is common knowledge that citizens can reside in another part of the country for years and not be legally recognised as citizens of those states/local governments hence contract working arrangements in the public sector for proverbial non-indigenes in many states. Surely internal discrimination! One must conjecture that this fuzzy application of right of domicile as criteria for citizenship is part of the motivation of the legal-governor to strike. It is unfortunate that other variables were not critically considered including her role as primary city/state. If Nigerians have the right to reside in any part of the country therefore they are not supposed to be internally deported to another state unless convicted of a grave crime or in compliance with an extradition request. The absence of coherent legal structures to formalise 2^nd/3^rd level citizenship through right of domicile exposes the flawed concept of Nigeria’s federalism.

Then the 70 (Igbo) men or so women were ‘convicted’ by the governor and summarily dispatched like cattle across the state boundary without recourse to law and potential social opprobrium. Maybe Ikeja conjured that quick and fast internal deportation is cheaper than going the whole legal route. Above all they rested on their historical amnesia laurel as if such action is ethnic-neutral in a country where ethnic sentiment is high for very good reasons. The question will be what happens to a Yoruba/Lagos indigene fitting the criteria adopted for current internal deportation?

The shallowness of the affair has exposed the governor as lacking in clarity in the purported exchange with his counterpart in Awka who rightly raise the issue with Abuja.  Sadly Ikeja failed miserably to provide its legal justification to the media at least to bolster her position which is more in line with uncoordinated understanding of information management. Therefore Ikeja succeeded in scoring an own-goal which in part left her reputation in tatters.  In Fela’s parlance, legal teacher has taught me legal nonsense. It is Law stupid!

Semantics Illusion

Concerned citizens have jumped onto the issue from both sides with their eclectic array of understandings. Some have moved across the aisle to dismiss any suggestion of ethnicity as if ethnicity is a no-go area al a IBB. It is the fundamental question in Nigeria and only when it is tackled with respect, clarity and progressive strategy can the country move forward. Currently Nigeria is an unfortunately leaking umbrella holding over disappointed 250 nationalities/ethnic groups. The speed with which some pundits rushed to dismiss the ethnic footprint of the victim reeks of rootless intellectualism without functional dimension. Which part of the world is ethnicity delimited or discredited with reckless aplomb? Even France failed to construct herself effectively along such lines.  This motley crew of knowledgeable men and women seem to forget that states are social constructions with dynamic changes over time.

It is insensitive of Lagos State and her governor to embark on this wild chase without historical recollection. Maybe they gave it thumps-up as doing politics by other means in parallel to Lenin perception of war as politics by other means.

Another vista of this intellectual hubris is attempted justification of the most inhuman act with pretentious light touch of Marx without details distinguishing from Bolshevik communism. It is impressive that these streams of knowledge deliberately run dry suddenly at the river’s youthful stage. Marx not only deconstructed class conflict but flayed those who assume power in the name of bring good only to betray it. In his 18^th Brumaire of Louis-Napoleon, he incisively remarked on the grave dangers of the French revolution which pretended to sweep clean the political landscape only to evolve into a position no different to the preceding decadent days. He noticed how the upper and middle classes conspired in the Napoleon III coup d’état to betray the commons with the massacre of Paris Commune leaders that represented the lower class. Eventually what the usurpers of powers succeeded in doing was adopting the state toward tight coupling with machines of capital accumulation via the market.

Despite the fact that current governor got into office by elections, some similarity is found in the latest fumble of Lagos State as the targeted deportees are no more than those the state considered wretched of the earth, unfit to share the space and largesse of the state with the powerful, the rich and the elite. Marx was right after all.  Unfortunately these unfortunate individuals are treated in the media as if they lack history and humanity, or have never contributed positively to the state and have no positive and lasting links with the state. Similar action by a foreign state on a Nigerian may potentially carry the mark of institutional racism and discrimination.

Final Legal Recollection

One of Punch Newspaper respondents in favour claiming to be a lawyer gave his widow’s mite by considering the act as legal and labelled it resettlement. In an increasingly interconnected world such justification attempt to lump Lagos State with some of the most despicable episodes of inhumanity.  It is worth reminding readers that as Dr Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to peace everywhere”.

Words similar to resettlement have been used and adopted to justify dispossession, repression and annihilation of peoples in recent memory. Scramble for Africa was implemented with similar illegal and forceful movement/dispossession/genocide of various African peoples by the French (in Congo), Belgium (in DRC Congo), British (in Zambia/Zimbabwe/Kenya), Germans (in Namibia/Cameroun/Togo) and Portuguese (Angola/Mozambique) in the name of law and order. The eminence grise of concentration camping of the innocent!

Peoples of Pre-Columbian America where invested with similar resettlements, dispossession, rape and genocide that reached its zenith in the United States during Andrew Jackson regime that finally consigned indigenous Indians to reservations till the present day. Eminent historian Howard Zinn captured these stark realities in his excellent book, Peoples History of the United States. Similar exploitations of peoples through forced relocation policies in the Americas is reconstructed by Eduardo Gealano in his epic, Open Veins of South America.

In the last century European elites not only decimated their population with industrial killing machines called world wars, but equally condemned the weak and vulnerable in forced relocation policies that annihilated millions like sanctions flowing from Adolph Hitler’s executive legal orders. Consolidation of nascent communist power projected Joseph Stalin to corrupt the first fruit of practical Bolshevik communism with mass murder of millions through forced deportations to gulags across the land. The remnants are today littered across the former Soviet Union with returning Tartars in conflict with later occupiers of their lands in Crimea and the burning Nargano-Karabak conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Lessons

In conclusion it is wise to admit that leadership is complex but short cuts do not provide lasting solutions. Leadership without understanding of history is counter-productive and such expression must be condemned. Lagos State and her leaders must be clear on the implication of their decisions because it has a vibrant brand within and beyond her boundaries that could be tarnish by reckless resort to quixotic pseudo legalism. Such mustn’t be allowed to happen again.

Egypt is still Africa

This glorious country with rich historical pedigree has descended into specialist media machination and mash-up of recent that you wonder if history has actually ended. However what is emerging is a testament to historical amnesia of majority Egyptians who have been sold down the river numerous times that they have lost count. The purpose of this article is to explicit forgotten lines on the conflicting imageries and narratives of what Egypt means and how today’s mess came to the fore. It is important to stress that ordinary majority Egyptians haven’t precipitated this outcome rather the powerful minority (elite) among them have.

Son of Africa

One of the sad elements of current Egyptian crisis is her apparent and deliberate loss of identity. There is no dispute Africa extends from Cape to Cairo, Cape Verde to the Mogadishu (the Horn). Later narratives have gradually with some success deconstructed Egypt’s Africaness and migrated it into the sad conundrum called Middle East. Egypt is one of the giant sons and daughters of Africa. In the early post world war 2 days, Egypt’s place was assured and secure as General Nasser reflected and transformed this historical patrimony.

What is sadder with the extension of this ugly metageography devoid of any continental underpinning is the depiction of the so-called Middle East as ranging from Morocco to the eastern ends of the Arabian Peninsula. It is curious that the metageography of Middle East is coterminous to lands mostly populated by Arabs, which in any case should be referred to as Arabistan.  In the bid to consolidate this front of self-determination coupled with rise of petro-dollar hegemony, Egypt was put on the back foot of both African and Arab leadership from which it is yet to recover. President Morsi’s reaction to the recent Nile Treaty ratified by most countries in the catchment area represents a perfect summary of Egypt’s identity crisis.

Historical Self-Destruction Marker

Post-Nasser period presented binary expectations for continuation of a proud nation with clear focus and unimpeded strategic goal which is not subordinate to foreign interest. Nevertheless the current crisis was signed and seal with Camp David Accord which simply evoked her death warrant. With this treaty Egypt lost every trapping of an independent state and an able player in the global field including immediate loss of leadership in both Arab and Islamic worlds. By willingly playing second fiddle Egypt was consigned to the side-lines of a summit where she is the agenda. President Sadat may have paid with his life but that payment was sustained by General Hosni Mubarak with vivacity.

In another strategic outcome of that treaty Egypt was summarily divided into two opposing forces, the power elite composed of the privileged dominating one party machinery including the military beholding to foreign interest, and the poor ordinary masses who wait endlessly for bread and or sort solace in the arm of puritanical interpretation of religious doctrines. Bamboozled with foreign aid of all manners, the elite slipped into comfortable coma letting down the majority in failing to accept them as the only asset the country have after all. Problems do not only extend, they mutate and bid their pre-explosion time.

Zero-sum geopolitics

Egypt in the persons of Sadat and Mubarak (and elite) permitted playing second fiddle as existential goal during the cold war however miserably failed to project post-cold war geopolitical calculus with any sense of national interest dynamic. In essence they count of being part of the winning team. Sadly there was only one winner! They forgot that it takes many lives to make one general. As the new world order took shape Cairo was immune to the emerging nuances that the sole winner want no challengers even as her relevance was reduced to check-mating the largest open prison in the world.  What commenced as a binary geography of world view that placed Egypt in the ‘axis of not - evil’ unveiled the fact that the only thing that mattered in Egypt is not the people but the army, an army whose doctrine is not national defence.

On the foot of unwinnable war on terror of which Cairo falsely believed it is on the winning team, another packaged upheaval or controlled mayhem mislabelled as a revolution ensued across the African part of Arabistan. Curiously the non-African part of Arabistan held, of course what is left of Iraq is anyone’s guess. A revolution unfolded as a top-down theatre where the majority down and out were mere players devoid of potency, cohesion and plan played along. Only that the elite were doing musical chairs in the interregnum. It is evil and this time one can paraphrase Clausewitz (of course for a member of the ‘axis of not – evil’) evil is extension of politics by other means. Therefore Egypt is a beneficiary of the evil that was intended for members of the proverbial ‘axis of evil’.

Economy Foolish

When a coup against an elected government is now debated on its (de)merits with the untouched army up again in the fore at least those apostles of democracy still relish the right to do a decent job. Egypt is down and out for another generation. Maybe South America may beckon for lessons learnt! The main problem above all is economic hardship and economic sabotage underpinned by neoliberal doctrine which will not go away until wealth distribution is implemented in a true mass reaction lead by the down. Apart from that the power elite will cling to power with divide and rule tactics in the short term while the big one waits on the window of time.

For those who have suffered most have no worries holding out as long as time allows. Muslim Brotherhood will not wait another swath of decades to kiss power again hence the bloody horizon. No easy way out of this one.

Lessons if at all Learnt

The so-called revolution has unravelled and it is time for majority Egyptians to seat down, think and regroup. They have been on the road of euphoria and intoxication hoping to make real change without time or plan.  In addition it is time for the majority to use similar binary cognition to distinguish between friends and foes; within and without.

Sadly and truthfully mayhem will not leave Egypt soon because the problem has morphed into hydra. Nevertheless the biggest lesson is for the Brotherhood to focus on remaining relevant to their base. They need to critically recalculate and reconscientize their raison d’etre, foreign relations, choice of dependable allies and strategic initiatives, revaluation of capitalism. ‘Egypt first’ policy will be welcome. Only then will the first seeds of stability be sown. Stop the isolation in the Arabistan camp as it is empheral and unsustainable. Nevertheless their problem in government is the problem of Egypt; cancerous lack of self-confidence. The future of Egypt among other places is not in the Peninsula or the Gulf (Arabian or Persian).

Excess Floorspace in Extra-Urban Igboland

Introduction

The reader may wonder why the subject is pertinent to warrant bundle of texts and space. It will be welcome to throw similar inquiry to the title phrase which suggests abundance in a particular geography (and time). While both theses are valid, the patterns, attributes and relationships including complexities underlying the subject deserve exploration. Moreso it is part of a consistent strand of analysis that attempts to shine holistic light on Igboland. 

From Space

Advancement of technology especially in remote sensing and satellite have provided a wonderful opportunity for anyone to zoom in onto their origin or village from any distance with manageable resolution. Google Map, Yahoo Map, Bing Map and others are part of global mapping environment for civilian and recreation utility. The most important aspect is observing the clear outline of your family home and compound especially the boundaries of contested places where disputes has cost resources including blood. What is apparent is clear evidence of low density of settlements scattered across Igboland with highest concentrations of built areas found mostly in state capitals. This will be addressed in full later. There is no contest between built up areas and dominant vegetation. Of course this doesn’t suggest that population follows similar pattern and this is the crux of the matter. What that is observed from space must be ‘ground-truthed’ for verification.

Ground Truth

Travelling around Igboland recently has exposed and confirmed a trend that commenced after Nigeria-Biafra War but accelerated in the last 3 decades by aggregate diminishing of the economy. This trend has economic, demographic, political and cultural implications. The gradual wave of emigration from extra-urban areas to the few urban concentrations in the former Imo and Anambra states has succeeded in part as the former population are not replaced by natural growth or immigration. Devoid of clear policy and investments in extra-urban areas it is impossible for these communities to compete with the state capitals which have become the ultimate destination. As a result housing stock gradually increased.

Spatial Realities

Mobility of people is usually not a threat to origin-destination matrix as each side benefit from daily exchanges and interactions. However movement of individuals and groups of people over time gradually produced a functional spatial winner-takes-all. This means that those who move from an origin to a destination are no longer permanent residents of the origin and hence do not contribute directly to its day-to-day activities. Destinations like Owerri, Aba, Enugu, Umuahia and etc become apparent winners though there is more to it than clear wins. Nevertheless their numbers swell as young unemployed men and women seek their fortune returning home only on occasions when it is affordable. This is one side to depopulation of extra-urban Igboland.

What is not difficult to miss is the increasing number of homes that are ‘too big’ for the current residents. In parallel is emerging increasing number of homes in various stages of dilapidation. The former depicts gradual or rather transformation of busy homes into ‘sterile’ nests for a few. The latter points to evidence of limited usage or reduced function for the few users what are constrained to monitor these homes for wear and tear. Even in clans with erstwhile large population, the experience is the same. What is interesting is the commonality of large homes with massive fences undergoing disrepair.

When you consider that most settlements in Igboland are linear on both sides of the road, you are confronted with a bilateral spectre of resignation and confusion with extra-urban spatial development. In addition to this emerging experience is the cultural dimension which is very powerful on various scales. In a sense it confirms the rejection of our villages as relics of gone-by days which have no relevance and lack productive essence. It sustains the view that our villages are mere outposts for infrequent short visits and space for ‘Denge Pose’ or ‘Power Show’ syndrome. This is no longer an attractive and viable space for living in most perceptions driving home a sense of fear which is accentuated by diaspora population especially their uncultured womenfolk and dislocated menfolk.  

Impacts

The first impact of depopulation and increasing housing stock is narrowness of roads including asphalted ones. Reduction in road width is evidence of few things. One is conflict which creates insecurity and abandonment. The other is peacetime abandonment due to lack of leadership and resources. The second point drives the point that with poor leadership and few employed young men, community maintenance becomes low priority. It is important to stress this outcome is not limited to the rainy season. 

The internal community dynamics which have exposed uselessness of time expected role of youth seem to unveil in the absence of ameliorating policy. The days of defined youth roles including responsibility for community maintenance are gone. With it also with a step to the grave is the socialist nature of community experience received from the ancients. I hope the word ‘socialist’ doesn’t make anyone look towards Marx and Bolshevik Moscow for answers. It is no surprise that social fragmentation and factionalisation is replete in Igboland.

Evidence

There are a number of points and areas which vividly exposed the gaps that drive the experience captured in this piece. We’ll be limited with the most obvious ones.

1.     Degradation of positive leadership is holding sway in various parts of Igboland. This includes but not limited to devaluation of community elder, development unions, the political elite, the churches and the state. They have all collectively failed (directly and indirectly) to replicate what the ancients managed with aplomb. I am not interested in wasteful debates on democracy rather highlight that collectively and individually above-named institutions have contributed to the on-going leadership rape in Igboland. What is clear is the lack of clarity on the role of these institutions in the current social, economic and political climates. You get a sense of posturing and burying the head in the sand.

2.   In the face of expansion of geopolitical units at the lowest levels, there is total failure to maximise potentials of autonomous community structure. While the cultural elements are recognised, the political and economic dimensions remain untapped as communities fail to seat down together under the auspices of their Eze to design strategic plans and development policies which serves as springboards for holding the state accountable. In a sense communities are apolitical, apathetic and lack nuance towards innovating new political machinery for solving community problems.

3.   Massive stagnation of communities in the inertia to embrace human development along knowledge-based principles. Since it took almost 3 generations to get most of Igboland accessible water and energy, it is obvious that the potential in these values are lost. What do communities do with or after acquiring electricity and piped water? Where do specialists comes from when these investments require maintenance? Surely not from host communities in most cases. You begin to realise that extra-urban development is stuck in crisis with inability to evolve toward self-sufficiency in physical and human development. The import of these views is in part to reduce dependence on asset-owning families and increase employability of young men if possible starting up firms in the villages. Community security and population could be sustained. Building new churches or new parishes will not solve these problems but rather increase them.

4.    In the battle of settlements it is clear that the few urban centres have won hands down as the giants and near monopolists of spatial development; social, political and cultural investments. One cannot avoid the binary nature of choice that is apparent in both strategic and spatial levels. Still it is a pyrrhic victory as these few urban spots are unprepared and unequipped for increased waves of immigration. Poor (few) housing, poor sanitation, crime, political corruption, few schools, few hospitals, confused churches leadership, high cost of living, etc are found in Owerri, Orlu, Enugu, Awka, Onitsha, Abakiliki, Aba and Umuahia. It is interesting that each Igbo state has at least 2 viable urban concentrations. 

5.    Lastly local government as an instrument of viable governance, deliverer of public service and enhancer of physical and human development in Igboland is still-born. For now it remains a well-spring of privileged few who command and control all its resources for themselves and their families. You can only hope that their future generations will keep it together.

Conclusion

There is an opportunity to re-address spatial and human development strategies at the lowest level in the communities for sustained growth. The issues raised above result from neglect and gradual accretion over the last 3 generations. What is evident is massive confusion to confront or adjust to confront issues in a new era by bring together a mix of received ancient knowledge and achieved foreign concepts. The confusion is not strange rather is an expression of deep identity crisis. For communities that lived in the same area for thousands of years before the present, they either find a viable solution to surmount their problem or they simply vanish themselves from the face of the earth.

Adjectives of Collective Degradation

There are many terms, nouns and adjective that Africans have accepted about themselves without question for a while. Many of these terms in themselves seem imposed at a time though not currently forced but still remain in use. To suggest that some of the terms are harmless is an understatement. With time and as the collective evolve, it is no longer misplaced investment to review some of these terms and the contexts of their existence with a view for introducing alternative terms or rather descriptions.

A few of these English terms or phrases have caught my attention for various reasons especially in their confusion to fully describe or capture the essence of subject(s). The most concern is generated from the fact that those (Africans) who should know lazily repeat these terms even on the platform of advocating progress which to all intents and purpose is arrested.  Examples of the troubling terms include African Tradition Religion, Tradition Rulers, Traditional Healers, Traditional Medicine, Traditional Justice etc.  Prior to making any progress on my concerns, one is right to ask who own these phrases and if their ownership has changed over time? In this regard one must acknowledge that there are knowledge creators (pace/trend setters) and knowledge consumers. Of course knowledge is an (expensive) product.  While question of ownership may not be settled in this piece, credibility of context of usage is open field.

Take the first one, African Traditional Religion. What is meant by African? Is this the context of disparate indigenous religions across Africa before and after colonisation or single religious template of or for Africa? By Africa I mean the undivided geo-continental expanse from Cape to Cairo and from Cape Verde to the Horn. Or is this a blending based on suggestion of structural and process similarity between indigenous religions as funnelled through the Kenyan Religion intellectual, Prof John Mbiti? It is as nebulous as seeking for numerical accuracy of grains of sand in a cup still many of Africans revel in using it. What is wrong with mapping each African religion to its people/nation such as Igbo Religion, Twi Religion, Wolof Religion?

Then space right onto ‘Traditional’. While in itself the word is malleable, however as a comparator it serves useful purpose of denigration and sustaining anthropological inferiority. There is no sense in one or a people self-relegating themselves even as time has come for them to take their future in their hands rather seriously.  The word ‘Traditional’ in this context is similar to second fiddle, inferior, suspicious, arcane and irrelevant. The question now becomes which religion is not traditional but how many are not traditional enough for the term ‘Traditional’ to be placed in their name? No one has read of European Traditional Christianity or Asian Traditional Hinduism/Shintoism! For some in Africa including Africans and beyond who do not profess these religions, there is no argument that they are remnant of devils fading glory. Unfortunately those in this unfortunate camp i.e. the holy quakers, holy shakers and holy rollers of new imperialist impositions failed to trace the true genealogies of their new template. And this inglorious ignorance is wreaking havoc and will continue for generations to come.

One of the things that cannot be said again of various Africa Religions is impunity and universalism via imposed force. Even the best minds acknowledge that in all these religions, ecumenism is the heartbeat. One can join or exit at any time. One can hold membership along with membership of other religious organisation. They project highest levels of awareness and ontological maturity which imposed religion power brokers only attempt not via patience but through sanctioning industrial-scale bloodletting. Indigenous religions have clear genealogy which should put Africans in excellent position to making the best of new religions requirements. Sadly many Africans mischievously relish their outset fixed with either colonialism and or imposed ‘independence’.

One of the most annoying things to observe is how those who profess progression of African agenda in the various non-indigenous religions cut hollow figures who cannot but represent existential conflict between their (mis)understanding and expectations or lack of them. What one is left with is a conundrum of confusion and stupidity advocating intellectual and ontological suicide respectively just to satisfy patrons and currencies whose only fortress is time.

Is the use of ‘African Traditional Religion’ not a glossy attempt to smooth over unique rich tapestry of each indigenous African religion which is curiously prominently re-emphasised in the so-called monotheist religions of the North! Active imperialism of the mind! Even in the case of cross-over or conversion, where Jews of pre-Christian era required to totally abandon every facet of their judaistic ontology and heritage first before they are ‘saved’ by Christianity? No, neither should the peoples of Africa. Nevertheless the dignity and true ontology reflecting as unbreakable chain of heritage connected to present Africans from millennia deserve not be ‘disappeared’ or debased for ephemeral destructive ideology disguised as true religion. It is civilisation incorrect!

The ambiguity of deliberate choice becomes explicit when you encounter legal definition of religions across Europe even in the erstwhile heartlands of so-called Christendom. You’ll be surprised that there is no winner takes all even with the settlement encoded by 1648 Treaty of Westphalia which is now pumped into ‘careless underlings’ as separation of church and state.

Considering points made in the foreground, time have come for repudiation of legacies of imposition which are retrogressive and obnoxious, and even harmful to African experience. The so-called experts and intellectual vultures/gold-diggers especially children of the soil should start changing the nomenclature and registers of terms. Pre-phrasing existence by adding African simply confirms identity crisis. It is no different from a US Caucasian calling an US African grandfather a ‘boy’. Africa doesn’t need growing up.  Africans do not need to think that they exist, Africa is because it exist; period. The mental slavery that relegates a people to passive consumers of their own knowledge rather than its creative custodians is a dangerous trend clearly exploited by imposed religions. It is no gimmick to conclude that religious imperialists killed more generations without firing a shot than any weapon of mass destruction attempted to annihilate a generation of Africans.

Therefore lumping things together as final basis has no justification or coherence even in empirical multiscalar investigation. In any case you have Igbo Religion, Igbo Medicine, Yoruba Justice, Tuareg Law, Heroro Medicine, Tiv Healers and etc. Identity crisis cannot be resolved through crisis of collective destruction. Waves of change do not emerge as a result of geographical determinism or kneeling down on the altar of inferiority celebration over time. Even for trumpeters of globalisation, be reminded that it did not excuse or ensure homogenisation.  Take a cursory look at Europe, what is clear is that comparative villages in Africa are sovereign geographical spaces. Even Scotland is making a bid for independence from United Kingdom though without knives and guns for now. 

Return of the Beast to Africa devoid of Amnesia

Newsreels are buzzing with events but what dominates the airwaves is what pleases the merchants of death and their ‘reputable’ media. Usually Africa is relegated to the section on violence, disasters and mayhem as if this is geographically determined. By proportionate share, an alert mind will only wonder why Africa has not been swept into oblivion. In a related case a BBC report alerted on an impending visit to Africa by the US President, Mr Barack Obama. Surely not as an ‘African’ American! It is important to take a deeper look into this ‘constructive’ decision, the timing, the pit stops and general configuration in global geopolitics.

This will be his 3^rd visit to the mother continent. It is also important to stress that he’ll not be visiting as an interlocutor because to all intents and purposes Africans have proved beyond reasonable doubt that no such thing exists for them in United States. Nevertheless the decision of the trip at a time when attempted regime change in Damascus is as good as dead is instructive. With Damascus increasing offensive against rebels and their backers with new gains across Syria by holding recaptured spaces in the theatre including a recent statement of force by Moscow on East Mediterrenean Sea, bad news can only be deflected not displacement. Sluggish economy on the domestic front is not refreshing either with African-Americans bearing the brunt of economic meltdown in the ‘land of the brave’ while bank bonuses continue to ride high devoid of White House real admonition. Too late now! When the going gets tough, Africa becomes a promise land. This is in the aftermath of ill-fated attempt to trigger onslaught against Pyongyang few weeks ago.

In any case there must be anticipation that the next quarter may provide a breather for the White House in the face of fair accompli of Damascus consolidation. This will be accompanied by renewal in Tehran with election of new president and representatives at the Masjid and strengthening of Hezbollah in Lebanon hence maintaining the Shia compact and integrity at least until the next round of offensives begin.  With a complicating Asian Pivot it seem June may provide an opportunity for recalibration on various fronts.

The geography of the trip is significant. It skirted the so-called revolution spaces of North Africa probably confirming that what took place where adventures in dreamland. The viability of the so-called liberated lands and revolutions can only be described at best as ghost countries with demolished present and uncertain future. Name them; Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, they are all on life support. Success is always milked by their heroes however in these cases action is stayed.

Probing further one is given the impression that extremes are key to unlocking secrets. Senegal on the west coast is the most viable political entity though a suppliant of Paris. While Mr Obama may or may not visit slave port relics, Dakar will be ‘constructively’ nudged towards openness to US AFRICOM agenda, engagement on Malian offensive and the war on drugs. The enthusiasm following ‘liberation’ of Northern Mali has died down with former champion walking away one after the other. Chadians made the first move. The recent past arrest of Guinea Bissau former naval chief by favoured agents is not lost on observers.

The next stop is South Africa. While post-apartheid leadership continue to posture in betrayal it is not lost on anyone that United States was not the key to their liberation. It is Havana under the leadership of Commandante Fidel Castro. The successful 1988 Battle of Cuito Carnavale in Angola led by gallant Cuban forces that smashed and eliminated once and for all the invincibility of US backed South African Defence Force (SADF) only stopped western aggression against Angola and finally paved way for Namibian independence and death-knell of apartheid hence majority rule in South Africa. Former ANC Intelligence chief and current president, Mr Jacob Zuma knows it because he nearly lost his life more than once from US inspire offensive. There is no doubt that South Africa is a contested space between old world and an emerging new world with the recent past BRICS summit a poignant point. US want to maintain a geopolitical and diplomatic footprint in Africa against so-called Chinese wave. Let’s not forget that Beijing decided to invest while Washington Consensus kept waiting for the right conditions for years.

Tanzania as the last stop carried interesting geopolitical nuances as a favourite nesting ground for US intelligence for more than a generation. The elimination of the ‘red threat’ i.e. Mohammed Abdulrahman Babu by the forced creation of Tangayinka and Zanzibar into Tanzania in the 1960 is instructive while Mwalimu Julius Nyerere serving as a ‘bulwark’ had time and space to sustain ill-fated Ujamma. One must acknowledge the role of Dar es Salaam University as the crucible of African research and intelligentsia sustaining the likes of Late Dr Walter Rodney, author of How Europe Underdevelopment Africa to name an individual.

Reviewing the trip based on the present carries little weight without matching it with the past. With a future projecting Africa in ascendancy with room for assertiveness in a multipolar world, United States is finally searching for her rightful place in that new world by way of rebranding her image in Africa. Using a president that appears African is a strong card but the jury is still out. It must not be lost on anyone especially Africans that for the first time in United States history, its president led an unprovoked attack against his origin without recourse to history. Smashing Libya to Stone Age is nothing short of war crime. Following it up with airlifting French forces to secure mineral resources of Mali 2 years later can no longer be dismissed as part time war making. In that period US armed forces under Mr Obama’s regime has multiplied drone bases across Africa in its proverbial ‘war against terrorism’ especially Niamey Drone Base in Niger a few kilometres from (an ally) Nigeria frontier and less than 500km from Abuja.

There is no evidence that United States under Mr Obama will change the tide of renewed Africa awareness and flexibility, more so the increasing relationship with Beijing. As for this impending visit, Beijing will be watching closely. No amount of constructive intimidation will wash so far as US AFRICOM continues to run riot toward the strategic goal of militarised recolonisation of Africa based on 'securing' her rich bowels and loaded geology disguised as ‘ war against terrorism’. For those who entertain phobia for Beijing, start by considering that they buy from Africa on open market and pay top money in strong currencies (Euro, Renminbi) and not quantitatively eased paperbacks.

In the history of US-Africa relationship the finally chapters will not be written by the most powerful all the time, for the sole reason that this narrative is an open living fact which the weak possess authority to account starting with oral tradition. Africans cannot suffer from amnesia even if one of their kind seats on the most powerful office for a while.