Introduction
The ongoing dilapidation of Nigerian
politics and economy has provided a set of responses from various collective
stakeholders including religious groups. It is poignant to stress that Catholic
voice and positions remains subtle at various levels and at best diplomatic. It
is the position of this article that subdued pronouncements of the Catholic
hierarchy on Nigeria state of affair is not a choice rather an outcome of
complicated & watered interpretation of relationship between church &
state.
In the Beginning
The last 2 decades has seen
Nigeria accelerate her strides in retrogression, abuse, waste and
self-destruction. On most social,
economic and cultural indicators; the numbers are mostly low, negative and
stagnant. Of course not everything is negative but for the most part the
picture needs enhancement. One may conclude that the biggest achievement
Nigeria had was not independence as it was handed down like a Greek gift on a
plate, rather the conclusion of Nigeria-Biafra War. For better or for worse
since Gowon Syndrome, successive governments have failed to shake off the
syndrome rather raise its profile. Gowon
Syndrome is former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon’s conclusion that
Nigeria’s problem is how to spend her wealth not how to manage it.
Flair of Faith
Nigeria has always been a space
of religions and faiths nevertheless one must state unequivocally that
non-indigenous religions entered this space on the vehicle of violence,
genocide and inter-generational destruction where applicable. Christian faith including Catholicism did not
enter Nigeria based on free missionary programme rather at the behest of
geopolitical machinations of empires on ‘civilisation missions’. London had no strategic problem for
non-Anglicans especially her enemy, Rome to assist her pacification programme
of recreating or making New Men/New Women in the conquered space for Monarchy
& Country. One must recall earlier relationship between Warri and the
Portugal from the 15th century which despite increases in trade and
catholic religious missions foundered when the Warri catholics calls for
Lisbon’s assistance in face of expanding slave trade went unanswered.
Biafra War
While Nigeria’s political
evolution carried religious weight or significance for sections of the
population, there is no record of resorting to zealous and fanatical violence
by those who profess Christianity as means for projecting power or obtaining
political relief. Historically, the current Islamic gangsterism playing out in
sections of Nigeria is an illustration of denied early warning sign ever
present before the emergence of Nigeria ‘on a plate’. Biafran War opened a new frontier of complex relationship
between the Catholic Church in the war theatre & the then military
government.
While the Church saw herself
as a religious cum charitable organisation helping civilians as best as it
could, the military government remained suspicious of the ordain leaders and
foreign partners not solely on what they are doing rather how they are doing
it. The climax of this relationship was the expulsion of catholic charities by
Lagos on the same suspicion. One of the
positive results is the elevation of the church ordained leaders in the war theatre
to positions of enormous responsibility with all the complexity associated with
it until the war ended in 1970.
Hierarchy Public Confusion
It is now a given that Catholic
bishops do not make public pronouncements of many issues of politics and
economy rather are adroit in taking the diplomatic option even though they are
citizens of the same Nigeria. The last time I recalled a senior church official
made series of serious comments on politics was the period when then Archbishop
Okogie was in charge in Lagos. He had
views as a catholic and as a Nigerian and those views were made in the public
space and some of them rattled the government in power. These views were not
outcomes of academic research, or articles on a newspaper/glossy magazine or
whispers from a press secretary. They were
‘live’ outpourings of a ordained catholic leader during interviews on various
social, economic and political situations.
No one reads or hears similar
briefings from members of Nigeria Catholic Bishops. There seem to have been a
sea change which has limited their statements, briefings and public comments on
situations in the land. One must confess that situation in Nigeria in the last
2 decades continues to be dreadful politically, economically and socially. This
is rather serious to the point that the head of Nigerian Muslims (Sultan of
Sokoto) if there is any such thing, has concluded that Nigerian Muslims or
sections of Muslims are marginalised. Real or imagined is debateable.
The Difficult Path
Becoming and being a Catholic is
non-trivial & complex like other human decisions. Being an active lay catholic
leader in public space is a complex matter which in no way is the fault of
these leaders. It is even more difficult for priests and bishops despite their
agency and freewill. The complexity of priests and bishops in public space in
recent times is conditioned on geopolitical forces and realities between
Vatican and national governments. In sense, one is free to conjecture that ‘permission’
to practise catholic faith is based on an understanding between Nigerian
government and Vatican.
Unlike non-catholic Christians who are not
constrained by compliance demands or meeting obligation of an external entity,
Vatican is to all intent and purpose the owner of Catholic Church in various
countries except China. In some countries with other Christian traditions, this
relationship is strictly regulated even to the point of actual lines of the
Creed said at Mass like in Greece and allocation of Holy days. This is the focus of Vatican geopolitical
sensitivity and its efficient ‘muscular’ diplomatic machine.
To ensure excellent relationship
between Vatican (Nigerian Catholics) and Nigeria per se, they exchange ambassadors.
Vatican ambassador or Papal Nuncio’s role among other things it keeping tabs on
the national church, ensuring that priests/bishops fall in line with
expectations especially in areas of potential clash of interests and finally
submit timely reports of the national church to Vatican. On this crucial point,
the complexity of ‘separation of church and state’ becomes bare and unhinged. Many
Catholics maybe aware of this dynamic and its rich complexity or couldn't care less
about it. The dangerous aspect is the complexity is expressed in defining a
catholic in any state. Is a catholic a citizen of 2 states even without
possessing passport of one? This is beyond the scope of this piece nevertheless
one may begin to share former Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin’s concern when he
asked, “How many battalions has the pope (Vatican)”?
However it is important that in a
turbulent political and social space, the catholic leadership not only manage
and administer temporal and spiritual processes but equally make unambiguous
public statements to update and teach the general population as citizens of the
state. One will even go as far as suggesting that in a space of contested
politics and economic meltdown, it behoves the national catholic hierarchy to
adopt a robust & active progressive programme of cost-effective intervention
through services provision especially in deprived areas. It is also essential
to encourage new crop of leadership from lay people with less ecclesiastical baggage
to enable them respond or collaborate with other forces timely and
appropriately on crucial issues at various geographies of the state.
Crystal Ball
There is a serious concern with
benign public profile of Nigeria bishops in recent times. For the past 500
years or so, Vatican sat under geopolitical constructions with highest
economic, political and military profiles. It is also a fact that Vatican relationship
with US hegemony/imperialism advanced during WW2 when both interests converged on the fact
the Nazism was the primary threat and communism the secondary threat.
Conclusion of the war provided the first test of the policy in Yugoslavia under
Marshall Tito and was further accelerated when Stalin expelled Yugoslavia from
the communist club.
With gradual rise of China in a post-communist era and by
implication contraction of economic power in Europe and North America, Vatican’s
influence may be constrained by Beijing’s profile. This is also connected with
unresolved problems between Vatican and various member of the Orthodox Church
which includes Russia even though Moscow has no global ambition. There is
growing concern that Vatican has not publicly expressed her position with
regard to Africa and Nigeria and there is clear signal of an understanding from
the Nigerian church. Similar issue can be raised on hegemony and imperialism projected by US AFRICOM and US destabilisation of Africa.
It behoves Nigeria Catholic
Church to have robust position on these issues with an independent disposition,
realistic objective and clear ideas based on experiences/concerns drawn from
the faithful and in line with Nigeria’s strategic objective and strategic
interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment